Raphael Kanu
The suspended Senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has faulted the Clerk of the National Assembly over claims that a recent Federal High Court judgment ordering her recall from suspension was a mere advisory opinion.
In a strongly worded letter sighted by The Journal Nigeria, and dated July 14, 2025, and signed by her lawyer, Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Michael Jonathan Numa, the senator maintained that the July 4 ruling by Justice Binta Nyako was a binding directive and not subject to the Senate’s discretion.
The court had faulted the six-month suspension imposed on Akpoti-Uduaghan in March, declaring it excessive and unconstitutional. It ordered the Senate to recall her so she could resume representing her constituents.
However, the Clerk of the Senate wrote to the embattled lawmaker, insisting that the judgment was advisory. Responding, Akpoti-Uduaghan argued that the enrolled order began with the words “It is hereby ordered,” making it clear that the court’s decision was binding under Sections 287(3) and 318 of the Constitution.
“The Senate is bound to enforce and give effect to the decision of the court,” she stated, warning that compliance was “not subject to further deliberation or discretion.” She also announced her intention to resume legislative duties on July 22, when plenary resumes after the Senate adjourned in honour of former President Muhammadu Buhari.
Akpoti-Uduaghan, who was suspended for alleged gross misconduct and unparliamentary conduct, had challenged her suspension in court, describing it as unconstitutional and politically motivated.
The dispute has sparked widespread criticism, with many describing the Senate’s stance as a blow to democracy. Analysts warn that the outcome could shape public trust in the legislature.